Claudiu Popa

Thanks for creating the issue @degustaf Yes, this is still a design goal that we'd want to achieve with `astroid`. There are two reasons for why this didn't happen yet,...

Hey @gyermolenko ! This might not be contributor friendly after all, as it requires going through https://github.com/PyCQA/astroid/tree/2.0 and bringing back into `master` the removal of monkeypatching methods. The gist of...

This is somewhat expected, but confusing at the same time. We have three types of line number: - `lineno` which is the line number for nodes that don't span on...

Hey @artificial-aidan Thanks for the report. You are hitting a limitation of `astroid` which is the fact that arguments passed via `__init__` cannot be inferred, regardless of what types are...

Hi @sdcooke and thanks for creating this issue! This performance issue sounds bad, we'll try to see what's happening. We recently started looking more into the performance of astroid &...

Thanks for the report.

Thanks for doing this @nickdrozd I appreciate it. The two boxes seems to be the `_get_return_nodes_skip_functions`, which I wonder if can be optimised further, and `wrapper` which actually comes from...

Would you be able to submit a patch? While I agree that makes sense, it's not something we can prioritize now, but having a PR from a contributor would definitely...

Hey @DavidCain That's a great analysis, thank you. Moving to a stack based solution definitely works for us, so would be great if you can write up a PR for...

Thank you @kodonnell for opening this issue. We definitely need to add some documentation around inference, how it works and various implementation concerns that come up when dealing with astroid....