Martin Martinov
Martin Martinov
It's only been 4 months, but already my memory is starting to slip. If I remember correctly, egs_brachy cannot be amalgamated into EGSnrc due to the differences in the way...
I'm unsure of who the go-to GitHub manager is now, unfortunately.
I think that would be huge. I _think_ the RAMP files and the getMass/getVolume differences (until the recent merge) were the only changes I had to deal with when updating...
I don't still have the hard numbers, but in my gold nanoparticle simulations when I first started using the high resolution option years ago, I found slowdowns ranging 10-14%
Maybe I should have titled this as a potential bug?
No problem, looking back I can see my title definitely was not the clearest :)
I've tested the changes to egs_nd_geometry and egs_dose_scoring by comparing an ausgab object 3ddose file with egs_chamber results (where I calculate mass by hand), and I get the exact same...
> Rebased on develop, no conflict. Honestly, a little surprised, but I'll take it. :)