ikbenlike

> Keep in mind that the `iconv` utility is also provided by `libiconv` as far as I’m aware, so we need to make sure to gate it in the iconv...

> leaving libiconv business out of libc is probably not a bad choice altogether It would be necessary to provide it for POSIX-compliance, however I see little reason to stop...

I mean, it is possible for `libm` to just be empty and have the libc implement the maths functions. But if POSIX compliance is not an important aim there is...

One nitpick: amd-ucode is the only package not prefixed with `linux-firmware`. Is there a particular reason for this?

personally I feel a command like this is useful - I have ran into cases where I want to purge a package locally, and having to go in with a...

> This currently fails the CI Yes, however, I am unsure if this is a "correct" failure or if there is a fault in my methodology.