Igor Kirillov

Yeah that's good ideas, there're more minor facilities like this can be added. I hope to get around to implementing it

Sure, but it probably won't be done very soon. I'm thinking about heavy refactoring and implementing something similar to [llvm::PatternMatch](https://llvm.org/doxygen/namespacellvm_1_1PatternMatch.html) first. That should help implementing this and other transformations and...

Actually I didn't work a lot with negative offsets, is it really that much of improvement? What the difference I see is that `__shifted` is the same as `CONTAINING_RECORD` but...

Wow, this is really nice feature. I've play with it around and really allows to make hierarchy of classes where appropriate virtual tables and virtual functions are selected in decompiler...

Now virtual table name and type will have those postfixes. Also if reconstructed class has only single virtual table it will try to infer class name (useful with RTTI information)...

Yeah, but imagine this case: ```c++ class A { public: virtual void AA() { printf("A::AA"); }; }; class B { public: virtual void BB() { printf("B::BB"); }; }; class C...

Yeah, that will do. The tiny little thing left is too implement it

Actually it is possible even with the current version. There's this button `pack` and it can be used to create parent class for every virtual table. And it's good idea...

1) Not sure I've understood problem. Could you specify? 2) Agreed. I considered making special window with list of scanned functions and variables. With options to remove or disable some...

Could you demonstrate an example with that problem? I'm not sure that I correctly get it. If it is related to not being able to scan struct pointers that only...