ignoramous

> In this view, the count of apps would drop to single-digit, with just a handful of apps like "SYSTEM" & "ANDROID" & maybe 2-3 user apps > I have...

> @ignoramous should you and i tell all users to stick with/switch to v055n in the meantime Yeah, the "pre-release" is just that. Besides, it isn't the case that v055n...

> If by the end of the day that will still be the case, I will reinstall from scratch to try recreate the conditions for the bug to manifest. If...

Rethink may have turned the setting off because its *Accessibility* permission (which is used to track the active/top window) is removed by the OS? This should ideally result in a...

> Ignoring non-encryption-aware service I believe this is okay and shouldn't hinder Rethink's ability to start its *Accessibility Service* once user is present (user has password-authenticated past the keyguard after...

At least one user reported that on Pixel, this setting wouldn't be applied because the OS refused to start Rethink's accessibility service (as it isn't encryption aware): #468 But reading...

While searching in DNS Logs ```py # crash log 11-13 11:15:26.936 1160 1160 E AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: main 11-13 11:15:26.936 1160 1160 E AndroidRuntime: Process: com.celzero.bravedns, PID: 1160 11-13 11:15:26.936...

Showing all targets (for example, cnames) in a DNS answer is much straight-forward. We'll see if we can implement that in time for the next release, `v055v`. As for showing...

> Don't let that delay 055v The impl is done! 🥶

Unfortunately, yes. It affects anyone using DNS53 on a port other than `53`.