ignace72

Hello. This is the status of the DisplayCAL brand: [https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=77634900&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch](https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=77634900&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch) The brand has been discontinued since 2009. Ignace.

I was responding to what eeickmeyer said in his first post: > The DisplayCAL name is still owned by the original trademark holders. While the GPL allows you to fork...

For the name, it just needs to be not too complicated. I confirm what has been said above about the GNU GPL. It is a viral license. If a program...

Good evening, Terrobility. The holder of a GNU/GPL licensed software cannot change the license. The only thing the holder can do is to dual license the software provided the added...

The majority of OpenOffice developers made a fork that was called LibreOffice and there was no feeling of a scam. Libre was just preferred to Free to avoid confusion with...

@pabs3, I checked, there is no obligation to keep the GNU/GPL license but the license MUST be compatible with the GNU/GPL license because this license is viral. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_license](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_license). That is,...

Hello, @eoyilmaz. Thank you for your reply. I'm using an ArchLinux/Manjaro package so the build recipe for version 3.9.6 is here: [https://ignace72.eu/displaycal/PKGBUILD](https://ignace72.eu/displaycal/PKGBUILD) It is not the official PKGBUILD which remained...