Results 119 comments of Jennifer Davis

@SteveDelFante I think the documentation has been updated. Can you see whether it's clear to you now?

Can you share the resource as exists in your recipe? Are you specifying the protocol as well as the binding or just the binding?

Based on the resource as defined here https://github.com/chef-cookbooks/iis/blob/master/resources/site.rb, it doesn't look like net.msmq is a protocol that's been implemented with this cookbook yet for that resource. Based on https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/wcf/samples/msmq-activation it...

@jkugler Thanks for filing this. We'll take a look and get this cleaned up. Getting a full disk is never a great experience. We appreciate you letting us know of...

Thanks for reporting. It looks like an unintended side effect of fixing this on mac os.

separate effort as the functions -> cloudfunctions is a large sized effort and involves collaboration with TW

@zroubalik what does the "needs discussion" label mean? It's ok to start implementing right?

@bshaffer can you review?

We'd love to better understand the appropriate action to take here. If you still have thoughts on this please reopen. Thanks!

@c2thorn why was the sample changed though? The provider and validator I can understand, but why was the sample modified?