Joseph

Results 197 comments of Joseph

So like tracing what happens with `getRequestHandler` and the `handle` it return, we see that, the parsedUrl param is optional - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/42690262d69988cd95e8317a725095f8f75f85cd/packages/next/src/server/base-server.ts#L1625-L1630 - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/42690262d69988cd95e8317a725095f8f75f85cd/packages/next/src/server/base-server.ts#L845-L849 And that later in the handler...

Can you post more of the error stack you got? If possible of course. Thanks in advance.

Thanks. Yes this is likely someone trying to exploit that CVE. And https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/73220#issuecomment-3614485330 is likely the same issue, but in your case, you've tested it with the `text/x-component`, rather than...

I don't remember exactly why but you might need to refactor the root layout a bit: ```tsx {children} ``` Something like that - should be fine right?

Alright, I think I've got it, started a draft, I'll try to work on it later today. It looks like for external resources, we already use GET, but for internal...

Oh wow, I had totally forgot about this - we need to revive the PR I had started. I'll try to pick it up this weekend, but I think it...

https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/84180 I updated the PR, I still think there's one more item to consider (returning empty body, when the incoming request is HEAD) - might be a breaking change though...

hi, have you tried with another package manager, or different version of pnpm? just in case? It runs without problem here, https://stackblitz.com/github/NeoSahadeo/Avg-NextJS-experience - 🤔

Really strange, a project that small should just run, as the stackblitz shows - Maybe give `pnpm next dev --turbo` a go too - Got more info you could share...