Ian Darrow

There's a piece I don't understand well: you mention that "arbitrators would have to keep up to date information about their blocklists on chain." But there's no meaningful review of...

> you mean a signed message directly from the arbiter to the miner in question? This may reveal my limited knowledge of the spec, but what about something like: -...

@whyrusleeping let's set up a time to quickly chat sync – I want to match my 1-10 scale with yours in the context of other launch functionality that's on the...

I think this is promising, especially as a short-medium term fix. The tooling would also be similar or identical to the tooling for storage miners to conduct pre-contract screens, which...

OK, great. Let's proceed assuming this can work. NB: it's still imperfect and we will have to make a little bit of a subtle argument around storing, but not serving,...

Tagging @whyrusleeping as an initial touchpoint.

Update: progress! The following type definition works, at least for CRUD operations. I don't use drizzle-kit so have not tested it with table generation. Posting here for comments and improvements,...

Chiming in on the extreme desirability of fast retrieval here – there is *extremely* enthusiastic product consensus that trading hard drive space for retrieval latency is a good idea. Tagging...