Eyal Alon

I'd really prefer this approach and keep the switch expression as is. > Should enhanced switch statement arms be an all-or-nothing choice? Ideally, I'd love to mix them but because...

@333fred It's very similar to LINQ where at times you need to transform query expression into a method syntax and sometimes even into a loop statement.

@scottdorman I guess that for simple scenarios and probably even complex ones you could use source generators for this so you wouldn't have to do that manually. ``` [NPCGenerator] public...

@scottdorman, @lachbaer Im not sure I understand you because it would probably be just a `Install-Package ` away. I like the original proposal but I think that the amount of...

@scottdorman I think that you need to create a new proposal for it, any sub topic should have its own proposal.

@gordanr Probably but why would you put it elsewhere?

I don't get why `role`s need an `implicit` and `explicit` modifiers, can't they be applied based on the context? what does it mean to have these modifiers? why treat them...

@0x0737 > Why unify roles and extensions? **Roles are intended to be used only in specific scenarios, extensions - in pretty much any scenarios.** Roles are declared as roles to...

@sab39 I don't know how I feel about implicit properties and fields, personally I think that only implicit parameters should be supported but if the LDT are going to decide...

I'm not sure whether something like the following would work but maybe quote the hint like this: ```csharp var example1 = """sql"SELECT * FROM table;""""; var example2 = """sql" SELECT...