iFoundSilentHouse

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/49361 but it's only for x86_64 & i686 for now. Still more arches than Arch linux has in it's package though XD

I should agree on that licensing for this DAW seem to not suit BSD license of void. I've made a custom repo which I will maintain and update. If you...

I'll make a support for musl later. Stay on tune :)

> @iFoundSilentHouse Why does it not suit the BSD license of Void? Packages distributed by void don't have to be BSD or MIT. In this case, it is clearly dual...

> What needs to be done in this case is to ensure that a non-free fork of Void should not distribute GPL software in it's repository. That is, if you...

> I mean issue, not PR. It seems it has to be done at the forum, so I'll do that. I guess github is fine too https://github.com/juce-framework/JUCE Yes... The info...

> the licence of void-packages (BSD2) has nothing to do with anything here. that licence only applies to the code contained within the repo (xbps-src and the templates), not any...

> @iFoundSilentHouse > > The issue templates say that you have to open non bug reports at the forum. > > I've opened it here: https://forum.juce.com/t/clarify-juce-dual-licensing-properly/60659 Hey. About bsd it...

> void prefers to package free software, and juce has licence terms that are apparently not free If I understand you correctly, void prefers not to package helio-sequencer(GPLv3) because it...

@blacklightpy I don't know man. We're only guessing. I'm sorry but I don't think it's such a big deal to continue this discussion. HS is already available in my repo...