I40KG

I40KG copied to clipboard

To check diagram with standard relations

6

[This](https://tutcris.tut.fi/portal/files/6578644/Siltala_1402.pdf) document page 72.

igrangel

Representing different parts of a Standard and Different Versions of a standard

5

As of now, We do not have some property representing the sub-parts of a standard. For example, [This instance of a standard](https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/1172) is talking about part 27 of the standard...

PriyankaNanjappa

Reasons for Equivalent classes

4

The class [ISO_42010_ArchitectureDescription](https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/blob/fa7192228b34a17dffbb7bddd8e624046ffc194a/sto.ttl#L630) is declared as `owl:equivalentClass` to the `sto:StandardizationFramework`, @sebbader, could you please explain which is the rationale behind this?

igrangel

Revision of hierarchy classes naming

5

Recently I noticed that some of the hierarchy classes in the [STO](https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/blob/master/sto.ttl) have different names but seem to describe same things, e.g. [rami:LifecycleStatus](https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/blob/bc8b4c09371c62eed6fc9a9b67fb21a7774d55b3/sto.ttl#L762), [rami:LifeCycle_Status](https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/blob/bc8b4c09371c62eed6fc9a9b67fb21a7774d55b3/sto.ttl#L768) and [rami:Lifecycle_Status](https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/blob/bc8b4c09371c62eed6fc9a9b67fb21a7774d55b3/sto.ttl#L758). Therefore, I propose to...

mmaltsev

I read your paper "Enhancing Industry 4.0 standards interoperability via knowledge graphs with natural language processing ", may i get the enhanced I40KG which was mentioned in this paper?

urSougly