Mike

This looks like it might be a duplicate of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy-website/issues/371 and should have been fixed by https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/4726.

This seems to be related to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4691. Since we're setting time in `First` the timing gets delayed when there are more inputs to process or winit has a weird delay....

would this supercede #3946?

since this superscedes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/3946 should we pull the example from there for using Locals in an exclusive system?

> Here are the criterion results https://nicopap.ch/p/bevy_exact_size_iter_criterion_results/all_changes.html I don't think any of these benches shown above use the query iterator. Do you have results for the benches in this folder?...

I ended up with very different results on my machine. Looking at check_visibility, my main was 1.46ms. I tried varying the batch size and it performed best for me with...

5600x (6 cores/12 logical) The only reason I haven't approved this yet is that james7132 have different values (1 vs 32) for best batches/thread. We need some more data points...

## On Subgraphs We should be thinking more explicitly about how we create subgraphs. In the current proposal there are three different ways that we define subgraphs. We have: Running...

How will subworlds interact with the scheduler? Specifically stages, states, and exclusive systems.

I'm against the idea of instant commands. Not having to confront the complexities of deferred commands at all will lead to code that is impossible to pull apart and the...