Hugo C
Hugo C
Hey @whoabuddy Is this issue still relevant? Thx
We still have the issue that with the following configuration we'll analyze "counter.clar" twice. ```toml [contracts.counter-1] path = "contracts/counter.clar" [contracts.counter-2] path = "contracts/counter.clar" ``` This could be optimized, we can...
Yes I'd like to keep this as part of a list of small improvements I can tackle in Q1 👍
I suggest that we use a specific notation for doc comments (such as `;;;` instead of `;;`) It would allow some doc specific features such as scaffolding of docs section...
I think I could find some use case where it would be useful to have it on mainnet. But yes, if deployment costs are an important consideration, we could have...
@friedger I see, I didn't consider "off-chain docs, including docs not for doc-gen" Not sure if it's in the scope of this of this SIP but definitely something to take...
yeah that could work but I'm not sure it would be perfect. I think it would be easier to have the discussion on a PR comments or on Discord rather...
Superseded by #4756 I'll close this one once https://github.com/stacks-network/clarity-wasm/pull/400 is merged
Any formater is good as far as i'm concerned. But I was a bit surprised with this formatting ```ts pox_4_info.value.data[ "first-burnchain-block-height"]; ```
Hey @jbencin This PR is still quite drafty, I haven't self-reviewed and it's mostly code that I didn't write myself. I'll update the description before switching to ready for review