huberrob

See also how the DISSCO community deals with 'digital specimen' see here https://github.com/DiSSCo/openDS/ and the recently published paper: https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e67379

Thank you very much @hardistyar! So I assume physicalspecimenId and institution code are mandatory? Robert

Apparently no clear consensus exists how to deal with the 'physical thing' in PIDINST. The proposal was to include something like a 'physicalspecimenId' (or physicalinstrumentId) which clearly (and replicable) indicates...

@RKrahl > Furthermore, I have to disagree with the statement that no clear consensus exists how to deal with the 'physical thing' in PIDINST. At the risk of repeating myself:...

Unfortunately the unit is frequently used by biologists in the context of photosynthesis in the recent literature and associated data. Here some recent literature examples: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2575469 https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpls.2021.758213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101152 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022cosp...44.2842F/abstract https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166610...

Maybe this article is useful: https://journals.ashs.org/configurable/content/journals$002fhortsci$002f14$002f4$002farticle-p492.xml?t:ac=journals%24002fhortsci%24002f14%24002f4%24002farticle-p492.xml&t:ac=journals%24002fhortsci%24002f14%24002f4%24002farticle-p492.xml I think it is accessible but just in case, here is the section which might be relevant (sorry for the copy/paste errors): **Photosynthetic radiation**...

Thanks for this excellent analysis! Defining Einstein as [E] in UCUM would be a pragmatic solution. Or can Einstein alternatively simply be expressed as : mol{Einstein} ? I just tried...

Regarding the references, Incoll et al. 1981 can be found at Google Books here: https://books.google.de/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vAbLBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA83&dq=Incoll,+L.+D.,+S.+P.+Long,+and+M.+A.+Ashmore.+1981.+%22SI+units+in+publications+in+plant+science&ots=kbT6B0FDX1&sig=uDoAa6MPzV0ASmneZ-RtqMlq7vQ#v=onepage&q&f=false And there is a similar publication here: https://www.agronomy.org/files/publications/jnrlse/pdfs/jnr010/010-01-0070.pdf

As this message : "WARNING | Landing page seems to be JavaScript generated, could not detect enough content" correctly reports the page is JS generated so there is not so...

Since F-UJI is a machine, it is focusing on the machine readable metadata during the assessments. Which can be given For example you have used the URI 'https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJNA767532' which contains...