Hiroshi SHIBATA

https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6440 is different changesets from 3.2.0-preview2. We already merged patch same as preview2 to 2.7 to 3.1 branches. https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6440 is the additional fix for Ventura and Xcode14. We have a...

@h-nagai Thanks to your pull-request. I added write permission to you in this repository. @jeremyevans and others: @h-nagai is the original maintainer of ruby-tk library. There is no reason to...

Synology may used debian fork distribution. You can install patch with `apt install patch`.

I don't have a plan to support the linter tool like `yamllint`.

👍 I'll support this.

@headius Thanks for your work! Did we get the approval for relicensing JRuby libraries that are this work at https://github.com/ruby/digest/pull/21#issuecomment-861015401 ? I'm not sure what we should get the approval...

I understood the current behavior of `required_ruby_version` is unfriendly for users. But we couldn't backport the feature of `required_ruby_version` handling for Ruby 2.3 and its rubygems version. So, Ruby 2.3...

I see. This changes is not rush to merge. I hope to merge in this year at least.

Ruby 2.6 is EOL today. I submit another PR to remove supporting under the Ruby 2.6.

@duckinator I didn't make the specification about this. I will reconsider after releasing RubyGems 3.0.