John Howard
John Howard
IMO we shouldn't do this. 1. Core k8s types do not (PDB and deployment for example). The one I know that does, Namespace, is a unique case. 2. Generally finalizer...
> This is not the case for GatewayClassFinalizerGatewaysExist. FWIW I don't think this should exist either :slightly_smiling_face: > The persona split is not a requirement of Gateway API I don't...
Can we consider changing the spec here? This is a bad idea IMO
IMO this is an issue with the implementation/spec, not the tests. The test has defined a perfectly valid set of listeners which cannot be collapsed. There are two correct ways...
I don't think its following the spec: > An implementation MAY also group together and collapse **compatible** Listeners belonging to different Gateways. Its a bit ambiguous but to me this...
I haven't looked at any other meshs, but I am quite familiar with how Istio solves this. We have a standard `echo` client/server that we use for almost all testing....
cc @robscott