Bill Hogan

“Handled automatically” - only if you religiously follow replaced by annotations in every single query, lookup, etc. Bill On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 5:43 PM jie zheng ***@***.***> wrote:...

The linked thread chose the adoption approach and the issue was closed. Was it not closed because that was the approach adopted? Bill On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:07...

We were not planning on taking the terms back. They belong in IAO. I strongly advocate the adoption approach with isDefinedBy annotations and IAO keeps the terms. Bill On Tue,...

One note is that on the OBO Foundry main page and on the OBO Dashboard, all OBO prefixes are shown in all lowercase. It would seem to argue against the...

In the OWL world we have both owl:deprecated = true and obsolete prepended to the label. I doubt the value of adding (or the need to add) yet another indication...

also if ROBOT does end up enforcing it then ontologies existing obsoletions would have to be updated. That's a lot of work of dubious value. On Thu, Jul 18, 2024...

For the record, I support doing it for labels, but not for both labels and definitions. IIRC ROBOT does the check for labels although I don't recall if it's WARNING...

Just want to point out that the current draft says all three (mark obsolete, prepend 'obsolete' to label, and prepend 'OBSOLETE. ' to definition) are a MUST (i.e., required) To...

I also wonder whether the Foundry can/should/would provide support to OBO namespace owners to register their OBO ontologies with identifiers.org? Or whether there is even consensus that registering OBO namespaces...

Thanks for the suggestions. Both work, and in my use case, both produced slightly different results. These differences are quite interesting (to me at least LOL). First, Jim's method: it...