Hervé Ménager

+1, github integration would be really an amazing feature, and is certainly very needed nowadays.

:wave: are there any plans in the development team to work on this topic?

:+1: one thing I'd like to include is cross-links to bio.tools entries, if possible. It would eventually make it possible for us at bio.tools to link from bio.tools to bio-cwl-tools.

Here is an existing example for bio.tools annotation I found in the repository: https://github.com/common-workflow-library/bio-cwl-tools/blob/release/qualimap/qualimap_rnaseq.cwl#L21 We could advise people to link this way, couldn't we?

> @hmenager - yes, that looks like a useful thing to add to the CONTRIBUTING guide. > > One more question on best practice: should tools be run through [cwl-format](https://github.com/rabix/cwl-format)...

This is great! we'll check very soon with @LucieLamothe to add this to the CI!

close as we decided for another name for "edam-ci"

additional thoughts from meeting with @matuskalas : - NCBO and edamontology.org uploads need more detailed documentation and to be accessible by all core devs. - for tabular formats, is there...

As a clarification to this request, I need to state that I am only asking for this in the case of "tool" definitions. Stian, does your objection also apply to...

The feature described here would be used not only as a UI specification functionality, but as a way of specifying when a parameter value is relevant. More specifically, the expression...