FAST_LIO icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
FAST_LIO copied to clipboard

IMU suggestion?

Open rahulsharma11 opened this issue 2 years ago • 7 comments

Hi, I have been using Fast_LIO with Livox Avia for my 3D scanning project and it is very good. Now i want to integrate external IMU for better longer run accuracy. I can use any of below-

  1. Livox Avia
  2. Velodyne puck

I have few options for selecting IMU-

  1. MTi-610 (https://store.clearpathrobotics.com/products/mti-610)
  2. NGIMU (https://x-io.co.uk/ngimu/)
  3. WitMotion IMU (https://www.wit-motion.com/digital-inclinometer/witmotion-hwt905-rs485-high-accuracy.html)

Any suggestion for which IMU should I go in term of accuracy and support? Or any other IMU suggestion will also be considered.

Thanks.

rahulsharma11 avatar May 09 '22 09:05 rahulsharma11

Hi @ziv-lin , @XW-HKU any suggestion?

rahulsharma11 avatar May 13 '22 08:05 rahulsharma11

Hi, Still waiting for any suggestion. Thanks

rahulsharma11 avatar Jun 14 '22 10:06 rahulsharma11

Hi, I am also waiting for the reply for same issue.

shikharx06 avatar Jun 14 '22 10:06 shikharx06

@XW-HKU please advise on the same. Even I am waiting to use FASTLIO with velodyne.

Any light would be helpful

aditdoshi333 avatar Jun 14 '22 10:06 aditdoshi333

The quality and accuracy of IMU are important, but the extrinsic and synchronization of LiDAR-IMU sometimes are more significant. For LiDARs without internal IMU, our recent work LI-Init (https://github.com/hku-mars/LiDAR_IMU_Init) is recommended.

zfc-zfc avatar Jul 04 '22 03:07 zfc-zfc

The quality and accuracy of IMU are important, but the extrinsic and synchronization of LiDAR-IMU sometimes are more significant. For LiDARs without internal IMU, our recent work LI-Init (https://github.com/hku-mars/LiDAR_IMU_Init) is recommended.

Hi thanks for the wonderful work. I will give this a try. Apart from that , my original question was which IMU will you prefer to use? I provided few options as well. Any suggestions on that? Thanks.

rahulsharma11 avatar Jul 04 '22 03:07 rahulsharma11

The quality and accuracy of IMU are important, but the extrinsic and synchronization of LiDAR-IMU sometimes are more significant. For LiDARs without internal IMU, our recent work LI-Init (https://github.com/hku-mars/LiDAR_IMU_Init) is recommended.

Hi thanks for the wonderful work. I will give this a try. Apart from that , my original question was which IMU will you prefer to use? I provided few options as well. Any suggestions on that? Thanks.

I didn't try the options you mentioned, so I cannot tell which one is the best. But it is recommended to read the datasheet of each product, the IMU with low-level noise and bias might be good.

zfc-zfc avatar Jul 04 '22 03:07 zfc-zfc

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

stale[bot] avatar Dec 31 '22 11:12 stale[bot]