Hartmut Kaiser
Hartmut Kaiser
I think we should not blindy add documentation across all files. We're trying to define a stable HPX API, currently and this is what we should add documentation for. There...
This was fixed by #6069
> What is the status of this PR? Should we push it for 1.10 instead? Yes, let's move this to the next milestone.
@G-071 we could do the same as we've done in similar cases before, i.e. wrap the whole `noexcept()` clause into a `#if !defined(HPX_COMPUTE_DEVICE_CODE)`
> I am interested in working on this project. I have seen that in the previous PRs we have added openMP pragmas for vectorization and parallelisation of a loop. Can...
> Hello @hkaiser , I am interest in this topic on gsoc24 ,I have a qeustion. Is this restricted to only use the #pragma omp simd to vectorize or using...
this is now subsumed by #6229. Closing.
This was fixed recently on master (see #6317).
@yurivict can you give me the build logs, please? This has to be another issue.
@yurivict you have the tests explicitly disabled (i.e. `cmake -DHPX_WITH_TESTS=OFF ...`), no wonder they are not being built. Can you give me your command lines, please?