Hartmut Kaiser
Hartmut Kaiser
@Neumann-A: Good catch! Thanks for the analysis.
> Is this issue still actual ? Yes! The question would be whether a simple mapping `hpx::cout` --> `std::cout` would already do the trick. I.e. something like a simple conditional...
@taeguk right, thanks for the heads-up. Should be fine now.
> @hkaiser It seems that there are only two distributed data structures. ( hpx::partitioned_vector and hpx::unordered_map ). Is it right? Yes. `hpx::unordered_map` has no iterators implemented yet, however.
@mcopik Thanks, I fixed the list above.
@tapaswenipathak I think the list above reflects the current state. Please feel free to work on this! Also, please don't hesitate to ask, though - this might be slightly more...
@biddisco Did you run those localities on the same physical node?
@shoshijak The documentation for the `future` type can be found here: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/experimental/future It's only the `async` overload invoking an action which does not support (lvalue) references or pointers. But this...
@shoshijak Also, we'd be more than happy to accept a patch which adds this information to the docs in a way you would be happy with.
@G-071 Gregor, this is the ticket I promised to create.