Hartmut Kaiser
Hartmut Kaiser
As HPX launches a new 'thread' for each invocation of the simple Fibonacci (this includes a stack allocation and a full future instantiation) implementation it will compare very badly against...
@mratsim Sure, I understand where you're coming from. The main question that interests me in the context of this discussion however would be where other runtimes 'cut corners' by operating...
Thanks for the links!
Let's work on improving these particular use cases in HPX first. Then I'd be more than happy to have those comparisons done again. That comparison was made a long time...
This is a specific problem of the MS standard library.
The memory counters use the CMake target name `memory_component`. I have not seen any name clashes here.
> Seems to only happen if you try to build static libs (HPX_WITH_STATIC_LINKING ON and BUILD_SHARED_LIBS OFF) on windows which doesn't really seems to be supported (Maybe configure should catch...
> > Historically > > When was that? When the x86 toolchain was still the default? (Could have switched to the x64 toolchain) I mean hpx is probably not larger...
I'll change the target names.
Sounds like a feature for the assert module sitting in the pipeline ;-)