Hilary (hilz) Holz

@umarcor It worked for us, although we ended up not continuing down that path.

While checkboxes aren't perfect, I took a moment and updated the lists :)

I agree we should fix the problem of the description not matching well with the tests, but I'd like to think this through a bit before we launch into it....

I'd rather see effort put into created canonical data and converting exercises to using generators than into crafting error messages for non-generated test suites.

I would far rather see good error messages in the canonical data than generated messages for assert/refute, as I have yet to find generated assert/refute messages useful. If they're doing...

I think it's best to only show the context rather than any part of the token. In re: @kamaln7's concern about users relying on being able to see the token...

We were just discussing what the benefit of `droplet compute ssh ...` was given that users can simply `ssh` into a droplet. Is it the convenience of using a name...

This feature is under development, stay tuned 😄

Thanks @benzionyunger I'm going to find someone from that team to discuss this with you :)

We're planning a thorough overhaul of `droplet_kit` in the near future. Retries then!