Xiaofeng Wang

It might be related with 4G disk size? Looks growfs does not work in this case. ``` NAME FSTYPE FSVER LABEL UUID FSAVAIL FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS loop0 erofs zram0 [SWAP] vda...

Duplicated with https://github.com/bootc-dev/bootc/issues/824

Can't reproduce this issue now.

Can't find this issue in my anaconda-iso test for fedora-bootc:41 image (https://artifacts.osci.redhat.com/testing-farm/e372b9f2-ecc9-487b-b331-5d883a1374ec/). > Are you sure this isn't specific to the ISO version? I will need to look at that...

I checked the install log, No any %POST error logs in console but `bootc switch --mutate-in-place --transport registry 192.168.100.1:5000/bootc-workflow-test:ldgz` does not work indeed. ``` Installing boot loader . Performing post-installation...

Now this issue exists on `fedora-bootc:42` and `fedora-bootc:43/rawhide` now.

Hi @cgwalters, I'm a little bit confused here. Why does the bootupd not replace the `Boot0000` which is created by package mode installation? But create a new duplicated one `Boot0002`?...

Okey, AI tells me the issue on C9S is older kernel and older virtiofs/virtiofsd userspace. The composefs install does many small-file metadata ops (walk /etc/pki/..., copy many small cert files,...

> BTW though, one thing we should do soon is split up a "build rpm" phase for the GHA because now we're building from source fully twice per OS. Do...

Yeah, I file an issue for tracking and use `continue-on-error` for centos-9 test.