Henry Schreiner
Henry Schreiner
I'm very much [invested](https://iscinumpy.dev/post/scikit-build-proposal/) in making scikit-build work. Though that includes rewriting the whole thing to avoid setuptools entirely. 😵💫 I am wondering if it's an issue with scikit-build confusing...
Is it better to leave the unfilled items empty or commented out? I'd like this to work out of the box as well as possible if someone forgets to customize...
The two package approach is common with Conda; I think it would work here.
By the way, since I don't think it was mentioned here, one the main reasons this is often not a problem is that if you add `cmake` to your `pyproject.toml`...
One of the points of distributing a cmake package is the ability to pin CMake. I should be able to depend on `cmake
I'm just a maintainer on the PyPI package, so can't add you there. You can send it to me and I can upload it, or @jcfr or @thewtex could add...
I believe PEP 599 added `manylinux2014_armv7l` (and `manylinux2014_ppc64`) tags, but manylinux does not build them (probably due to a lack of native support for any CI systems). https://github.com/pypa/manylinux It's possible...
Do you know why this might have passed with 3.22.0 but not with 3.22.1?
I don't see anything here: https://github.com/scikit-build/cmake-python-distributions/compare/3.22.0...3.22.1 that seems likely to break?
Ahh, [piwheels](https://www.piwheels.org). I think their CI just takes a little time after a release. Tell pip to require binaries and that will fix the small window after release issue. One...