henbos

Thoughts, my fellow transciever enthusiast @jan-ivar? I'm leaning towards Proposal A but I don't have a strong opinion

> Side-note: this is also consistent with DCs: if the only DC that exists is closed prior to being negotiated, we don't add an m=application line to the SDP. (Actually...

Moving DC discussion to #2839. Let this issue only talk about transcievers in limbo :)

Yep, I think the test was prior to our changes and I don't think our changes intended to change this specifically, only address the offerer tagged footgun. Considering all browsers...

> > Muted is outside the control of web applications, but can be observed [... reasons why mute can happen]. > > The User Agent SHOULD provide this information to...

Will you provide a clarification PR @vr000m ? (I think we can merge such PRs even if #746 has yet to be resolved)

Having it be signed instead makes sense to be

The idea based on different spec discussions (e.g. [this](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-extensions/pull/77)) is that we should have a counter for camera fps on the track and then each frame consuming use case should...

Editorial label because I'm not proposing to change what was, as far as I understand, always the intent of the spec. E.g. we always counted this in webrtc, and I...

Here's another edge case: Chrome has a feature where, to save on performance and bandwidth, screenshare tracks stop capturing new frames when the content is static. But to ensure good...