Hector Munoz

Results 58 comments of Hector Munoz

I was just about to open an issue about this. I often have a project structure as follows: ``` . ├── .git ├── jupytext.toml └── notebooks ├── demo.ipynb └── demo.py...

Hi @mwouts thanks for the information and clarification. Could you provide more information (link) about the `get` method from Jupyter contents manager? I'm a bit busy to make a PR...

@mwaskom , @shoyer Is this issue still open and unsolved? It seems germannp's comments were unrelated. I know you can adjust axes limits after creation and plotting pairgrids, but it'd...

@aloctavodia I'll work on a PR that follows the current format as existing plots. Thanks! I'll check in if I have questions.

Hi @OriolAbril , I agree, this could be very clean and simple since it mostly relies on existing plotting functions in arviZ. In my first draft of my function that...

If I follow you correctly: - the diagonal will always be default `plot_posterior` (if shown), and the user can still pass along specific `kwargs` - one triangle will always be...

Will `coords` allow the user to select particular (or all) chains to compare, or that is another matter that you were bringing up?

Hi @OriolAbril , the functions as parameters makes sense. I was thinking of creating the the function that subtracts and plots the two posteriors in a way that we still...

This is very nice @OriolAbril ! 👌 So you would be proposing adding both `plot_func_posterior` and `plot_pair_extended` to `arviZ`? I see how `plot_func_posterior` is being sent a dictionary of the...

The dictionary is definitely a clean usage from within `pair_plot_extended`. Maybe `plot_func_posterior` could be updated to also receive data like: `data.posterior['theta'].sel({"school":['Choate', 'Deerfield']})` This could be done by modifying `plot_func_posterior` a...