Howard Bushouse

@penaguerrero Is this still WIP or is it ready for review?

Regression test run?

@tapastro If you can address my couple of review questions I'd be willing to approve. Unless you think it needs more work.

The 1301 regtest run shows only the expected differences in products created during Detector1 processing (before ramp fitting), which now contain either the extra "AVDRKCUR" image extension or the new...

@jemorrison What's the latest regression test run for this one? The last one I see reference here is 1267, which still has all the recursion errors in it.

The results from https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/job/RT/job/JWST-Developers-Pull-Requests/1280/ look fine. Of the 58 failures, about half are unrelated and benign, due to a change in the resample step to remove the use of the...

Latest regtest run (1298) shows only the expected updates involving BUNIT keywords. So this looks good. I'll approve and merge.

@rcooper295 The PR is showing a couple of file conflicts with the latest updates. Can you try to resolve those so that we can get a final test run of...

FYI: I started a full regtest run using this PR branch and the latest CRDS-TEST context (which contains NRM and all other routine updates) at https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/job/RT/job/JWST-Developers-Pull-Requests/1350/

Minor failure in style check due to import of `scipy.integrate.simpson` no longer being used (it was deprecated in another recent PR).