Hasier

> @hasier I'm going to merge this to master and perhaps tag you in a PR if I decide to make any changes from the public API perspective before making...

> @hasier I didn't end up with much changes to warrant a separate PR so have pushed straight to master. Mostly some reductions in code, typing & documentation tweaks. You...

@jd any more thoughts on this? Happy to clarify anything else I may have missed.

@jd I merged changes from `main` and tests seem to pass, feel free to re-approve and merge whenever you prefer 🙂

@jd now that this is merged, do you think it's ready to be released in a new version? Or would you rather see some [async strategies](https://github.com/jd/tenacity/pull/451) merged first too? ~The...

@jd sorry, I've been busy these last few days, could you take another look at [my latest comment](https://github.com/jd/tenacity/pull/451#discussion_r1593883436)? 🙏

@jd any idea what might be going on with the Tornado tests? https://github.com/jd/tenacity/actions/runs/9347251510/job/25723863307?pr=451

@jd seems like [a fix has already been merged and released for the Tornado issue](https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/pull/3382). I guess that means you can close https://github.com/jd/tenacity/issues/460, as [tests should automatically pick the latest...

> Add release note Good point @jd, done! Let me know if you want me to amend in any way 🙂 https://github.com/jd/tenacity/pull/451/commits/4aa9ccf271cb37b0ac37437075bb25b033a2da0a Also, I just realised finally I only added...

Thanks for the review and merging @jd! 🙇 Are you expecting to release a new version soon? 😁