Daniel Mangum

Just to note, the spec already allows some fields to be optionally supported, so OAM objects are not strictly portable today. I assume the reasoning there is that we want...

@luebken apologies for the long delay here! We now have initial CI in place and artifacts are being uploaded alongside the worflow runs (example: https://github.com/hasheddan/k8scr/actions/runs/2034352096). We should have a first...

@Vad1mo sounds interesting! Are you imagining the "satellites" as pull-only then?

@Crayeth yep that should be possible :) Feel free to share any additional details about your setup so I can be sure the changes accommodate your use case

@saharlaor thanks for sharing your use-case! This project does not currently support image building (though it could). The primary function of this package is being able to govern access to...

@kelvinwijaya thanks for opening this! Could you add a little more context around what is happening here? Are you saying that you: 1. Created a CompositeResourceDefinition (XRD) with an invalid...

The new [`xpkg` specification](https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane/blob/master/docs/reference/xpkg.md#object-annotations) defines support for object annotations, which could be a great fit here. Would want to make sure we had support for generating these annotations on CRDs...

@jbw976 @negz @bassam tagging steering committee members here, I would be happy to open a proposal for this for review 👍

> Do you think that introduces risk of a ProviderRevision to claim the control of a CRD that belongs to another Provider? @muvaf yes I think that is a risk,...

@muvaf I was looking back at this and wanted to clarify on the concern of "risk of a ProviderRevision to claim the control of a CRD that belongs to another...