Daniel Mangum

@muvaf yep I'll pull some of our real-world examples and show how the change would impact :+1:

That seems like a good move. However, my one concern is if a resource gets in a state where it continuously reports that it needs to be updated. In that...

> But now that you mentioned it, I can be convinced to call update in delete call of RDS controller and let this issue be solved in 0.5. Yeah I...

Just found this old issue and realized it has a lot of similarities to https://github.com/hasheddan/crisscross

@negz yep! However, I also imagine crisscross doing things like "read-only" loops to send connection details to alternative locations, other day 2 operations, etc.

@luebken to be clear, this is not due to a leading document header, but rather due to the fact that there is a complete document that only contains comment data....

@negz putting it in `ExternalConnection` seems good to me :+1: I would advocate for going ahead and doing that as I think a fair number of community members have already...

@juniorz could you update with DCO here? :)

I am taking all of the missing examples from `apigatewayv2` group: - `APIMapping` - `Authorizer` - `Deployment` - `DomainName` - `Integration` - `IntegrationResponse` - `Model` - `RouteResponse`

@negz It is not! Thanks for catching, will update :)