Sriharsha Chintalapani
Sriharsha Chintalapani
@mohityadav766 guessing this is not needed. Closing.
@priyan5485 @HeartSaVioR this will be a difficult problem to solve at this point. Ideally we should just pass required client configs instead of packaging configs but thats for later. Even...
@priyank5485 I've seen this before. Not sure exact way to reproduce this. I thought we removed the UUID from the jar name because of this issue. @arunmahadevan didn't we remove...
Lets remove Caching from storage as we really don't need it. We can keep the caching details around custom processor.
@arunmahadevan this requires considerable changes on the UI and backend side. So moving out of this release. We also need to re-think projection processor UI. cc @satishd
@hlivian would like to make this change post GA. we tested it multiple ways before and I like the current approach.
Moving out because of risks associated with. Will re-visit in 0.6.0 milestone.
@pgibert I think the streamline-dev.yaml has authorizer config here https://github.com/hortonworks/streamline/blob/master/conf/streamline-dev.yaml#L28. Can you delete the lines 28-31 and try again.
@arunmahadevan can you outline the work and it would be good to create sub-issues if possible.
@OnkarVO7 please provide an update here