Miloš Prchlík
Miloš Prchlík
> @happz is it ready to be merged? I don't think so, it needs more reviewers :) And ready or not, it needs some labels and a milestone.
/packit build
Unrelated failures - plenty of them. Merging.
> Thank you for reviews and merging, when do you expect this to be available in production? Released? Early September, 1.36 is supposed to be completed at the end of...
> I'm not sure about the 'model' part. In beaker, I don't see a way to filter by (maybe I'm missing something). > > While other provisioning methods could theoretically...
Added `discuss` label - we're still unsure about `model-name` being used to pick the IOMMU "model". We're considering `model`, `model-name`, but also `platform`, `driver`, and maybe other ideas. Leaving the...
> Just did a quick check with the following `provision` step config: > > ```yaml > provision: > how: beaker > hardware: > iommu: > is-supported: true > ``` >...
/packit build
Unrelated failures, merging.
> > [@qcheng-redhat](https://github.com/qcheng-redhat), could you please confirm if your use case is covered by the proposed `adjust` rule above? > > Hi Sorry for the late reply. Yes, the current...