Henry Andrews

Thanks, @BigBlueHat . I'm staying fairly heads-down trying to get 2020-06 out (which may include some tweaks to the vocabulary system based on early feedback, and should be the draft...

Note that as of draft-07 there are other mechanisms, per #40 in this repo. In draft-08, `dependencies` will split- the schema form used here will (almost certainly) still be called...

Hello! I'm dropping by from the JSON Schema specification project to let you know that the current draft is draft-07, which is a minor update of the more significant draft-06....

HI folks- I'm dropping in from the JSON Schema project. We are re-organizing our implementations page to promote projects supporting at least draft-06, the first significant draft since the project...

@corleymanz yes, that is correct. `unevaluatedProperties` in draft 2019-09 was created to address this use case, which has been a longstanding (like since at least 2012ish) complaint. Draft 2019-09 ([formerly...

@korzio draft-07 is a fairly straightforward superset of draft-06 draft 2019-09 has more substantial changes, but we are hoping that it will be the stable base for finalizing the standard....

@korzio @Relequestual just set up an OpenCollective for the JSON Schema project so he might have thoughts on that.

draft-06 is out! [Guide for core and validation](https://github.com/json-schema-org/json-schema-spec/wiki/FAQ:-draft-wright-json-schema%5B-validation%5D-01) [Guide for hyper-schema](https://github.com/json-schema-org/json-schema-spec/wiki/FAQ:-draft-wright-json-schema-hyperschema-01)

@danballance in the meantime, you can always use a single-element `enum` in place of `const` as a further workaround. `{"const": 42}` is just shorthand for `{"enum": [42]}`. It's easier to...

@danballance @yuloh Note that [draft-07 is now nearing publication](http://json-schema.org/work-in-progress)