Ciprian Hacman
Ciprian Hacman
Upstream was also fixed in https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-gcp/pull/842
Thanks @zetaab. Once a fix exists, it will *probably* be backported.
I think this is a good candidate to merge after cutting the branch. Any thoughts? /cc @SergeyKanzhelev @wangzhen127
@SergeyKanzhelev I think this PR has some valid changes. Let's discuss a little before closing.
/ok-to-test
@wangzhen127 I am not sure if `-v=5` the exact value, but I agree with the approach. Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/issues/945 /lgtm
/cc @wangzhen127 /assign @wangzhen127
CC @nikhil-bhat
> While we explore other options. I don't think this is totally unreasonable, but I don't think it'll be used very often; and it has the downsides of increased image...