Tomas Rimkus
Tomas Rimkus
Looks like @zMotivat0r just gave up on this library and there won't be any further development.
Same issue here. Seems to be an issue with `class-validator` itself, not `validator.js` it's using. Following code works as expected with `validator.js`: ```js const validator = require('validator'); validator.isISO8601('2009-02-29', {strict: true});...
Ok, found the bug [here](https://github.com/typestack/class-validator/blob/6ebcca67b4828d3f8717ad197e2d0fa3530240f7/src/decorator/string/IsDateString.ts#L27). Unlike [IsISO8601](https://github.com/typestack/class-validator/blob/develop/src/decorator/string/IsISO8601.ts#L31), `IsDateString` doesn't send the options object to the validator. Line 27 should be changed to the following in `IsDateString.ts`: ```ts validate: (value, args):...
@MrFrankel can you merge this?
I am using 1.2.6. Can you link to the bug you are speaking of? I have bowden setup with around 55cm bowden tube. I am using 1.75mm filament and e3d...
Maybe you can link to git commit if you can't find relevant issue? BTW, Travis CI builds are failing if you haven't noticed.
I don't see anything related to pressure advance in 1.2.7 changelog and it still says "0-10" are reasonable values while they are clearly not...
@Sungod3000 I am printing at pretty low speed as my printer is not as sturdy as I would like it to be and I am mostly printing small objects. Here...
Yeah, one of the main reasons I started experimenting with pressure advance was that when I moved from direct to bowden I could see that in some places corners were...