Ho Cheung

> Is it planned to support JXL files after M109? it seems like a reversion patch could be made for [this commit](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/166a9f3c512fb7806324af7b4fdd85bee0cde149) to restore support. > > websites that that...

> I should mention that if a patch is created it's recommended to edit the "DEPS" file and change > > ` 'libjxl_revision': '8001738dc9cd8dc6fa24cf75fefd08f909b2ac3c',` to ` 'libjxl_revision': 'c27d499263435ac77007174e0f1cf54557cff23a',` > >...

> Is it planned to support JXL files after M109? it seems like a reversion patch could be made for [this commit](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/166a9f3c512fb7806324af7b4fdd85bee0cde149) to restore support. > > websites that that...

> It would be good to know if JPEG XL support will remain in Thorium after M109. I'm certainly hoping @Alex313031 can confirm this intention, since Thorium is currently the...

> What can we do to reduce development pressure? > > Would it help if we (libjxl devs) maintain an up-to-date chromium patch for jxl somewhere (e.g. on the chromium...

This is the branch I maintained to restore JPEG-XL. At present, it is impossible to compile the new version of Thorium using this branch, and some files need to be...

Today or tomorrow I will complete the rebase operation of the jxl branch

> I will try to see if I can keep an up-to-date rebased version of libjxl in chrome on https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/ and let you know if this is done. @mo271 Thanks...

The jxl branch has just undergone an update, checking out the following commits should be able to combine jxl and Thorium files in the repo for compilation. commit ecc9df48e429ef865536a91c25f3f580ddcf0016 (HEAD)...

@mo271 I just updated the repo again and tried to compile a version with JPEG-XL with the updated files, but after running the gn args command, I got the following...