gyl
gyl
I noticed that the upstream code and our code are not consistent. Perhaps we need to update? https://github.com/rvelea/LightPcapNg/blob/33296580096f83a9f17ebe7ea3d2c79977a24471/include/light_platform.h#L52
Agreed, let's sync the updates upstream so that others can benefit from our updates as well.
Using a fork and contributing updates back to the upstream, if the upstream cannot accept our updates in a timely manner, we maintain the fork. Would this be better?
> How many cores do you have? I think maybe we can make it to 64? My current project aims to use 32 cores. However, since the MasterCore occupies one...
> > 128 or 256 > > Having the `CoreMask` be >64 cores would require a change of the `CoreMask` from a `std::uint32_t` to a dedicated struct as the bitmask...
I will continue to follow up, but it may be sporadic.
@seladb The same issue we are discussing here now.
@seladb Yes, in the current implementation we have not restricted the core. This is precisely what we need to address.
@seladb I discovered that DPDK unit tests also fail on a 16-core machine. I've opened a new issue. Once we pass all unit tests on systems with fewer than 32...