Prashant Sharma

Do we have a workaround for it?

I have two different versions of cppcheck installed on two different machines. One of them has version `1.76.1` and other one has version `1.82` installed. However, when I used cppcheck...

Isn't `cppcheck` and `cppclean` different? And doesn't `CPPCheckBear` uses `cppcheck`?

@jayvdb can you review it? I just need to know if I am taking the correct approach for using the `Language` class defined.

Hey @jayvdb can you help to find why `appveyor` and `travis` are giving different assertion errors and even though they are passing on local?

On researching, I found that the Travis is failing because it is using `cppcheck 1.52`(https://travis-ci.org/coala/coala-bears/jobs/575212105#L295) which doesn't support the `language` parameter and hence generating error resulting in return a `None`...

Appveyor is failing because it is using `cppcheck 1.88`(https://ci.appveyor.com/project/coala/coala-bears/builds/26877468/job/i2incdndjdui7jvf#L246) which generates different output when using the `language` parameter. As expected, it does generate 3 error when I specify `--language=c` though...

@StanleySweet the parameter seems to work. But as I explained above, the tests are failing due to different versions of `cppcheck` for Appveyor and Travis. IMO the solution to it...

TBH, I am not able to understand the issue here. Maybe an example may help. But if we are applying the timezone and stripping it off, to eventually apply the...

Thanks @onlynone! It's clear now. I understand where the difference comes from. As far as I understood, previous to, when the date goes to the `apply_timezone_from_settings`, it got converted into...