gtsueng

@NeilWipat, @chrisAta, @udp, @nathandunn, @intbio-ncl -- please see discussion above and comment on whether or not you will continue to actively work on the DNA and/or RNA specifications.

Thanks for finding these issues. The MolecularEntity profile above version 0.5 has rendering issues on the website due to the JSON-LD having a required optional (i.e. - at least one...

Hi @thomasrosnet the BioSample profile has not yet been generated in JSON-LD in the specifications folder, which is why it has similarly not been propagated into the DDE. The reason...

The cardinality issue was included in this discussion: https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/323

Discussion from [bioschemas issue 594](https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/594) created by [@meier-rene](https://github.com/meier-rene)

Similar to the `keywords` property which has been updated to include DefinedTerm, many keyword-like properties like `measurementTechnique` could also benefit from the inclusion of DefinedTerm in the range of the...

@danbri-- @ljgarcia and @nsjuty are still in the process of reviewing properties that would benefit from having DefinedTerm in the range. So far, they have identified the following properties: -...

Hi Steffen, For the types, all parent classes are potentially inheritable, but it's not necessarily the case that the Bioschemas working group that developed the schema would **even mention** the...

The new draft (0.7) now includes subjectOf in the JSON-LD. This issue can be closed once the pull request [#727](https://github.com/BioSchemas/bioschemas.github.io/pull/727) for the corresponding changes to the website have been merged.

Updated to DDE