gthompsnWRF

@davegill Yes, I didn't catch the overlap with FLAG_QNWFA because I thought perhaps the each-month value might have done it differently. I think it would be safe to remove from...

I did things with my own WRF code to *eliminate* the bogus 2001 level - that way all MP species, moist & scalar only ever have WPS num_metgrid_levels since none...

@mgduda Actually, I mis-spoke/wrote! The number of levels for QNWFA and QNIFA depends on whether these data are coming in from another model (e.g., RAP/HRRR) or from the Climatology data....

> Good point @dudhia. I'll create distinct table names then. This is simple. This sounds like the best idea. A distinct table name for qr_acr_qg for each of the options...

I should have one more look at the code changes just to double-check a few things. Thanks Maria for doing this!!!