Grigorii Osipov

I have same issues still

I have managed to make below Dataframe, same as standardly used reliability_data in this project. (Ignore the decimals, it's necessary for me). Assertion will verify that those are the same...

[My full implementation from a while back](https://github.com/grigsos/Master-thesis-excel-proccessing/blob/9217645e6f40cf14068b89d6261fc953a7b9d004/src/methods/data_import.py#L94), with a [redundant single rater logic that was fixed after I have wrote the code](https://github.com/pln-fing-udelar/fast-krippendorff/issues/26) ``` def get_krippendorff_DF(inDataFrame): data = inDataFrame.T.values.tolist() data_tuple =...

If you add this the below code into line 310 of krippendorff.krippendorff.py it will process it naturally ```python if type(reliability_data).__name__ == "DataFrame": data = reliability_data.T.values.tolist() data_tuple = tuple(' '.join(map(str, row))...

I think I made it work, but I'm new so not too sure. Replace the current values in decorators.py ``` try: import pandas as pd from pandas import json_normalize _no_pandas...