Grigori Goronzy
Grigori Goronzy
FWIW this mostly needs a documentation update I guess. I also noticed that just `await`ing isn't cutting it, is this possibly optimized away?
As far as I can tell, that MR implements IPv6 NAT as an optional mode of operation for IPv6. This is a completely different matter. Please reopen.
I don't really see how that is out of scope. NAT indirectly forces a default-block policy in a sense. The same can be achieved with regular routing and a stateful...
This doesn't really make sense. Maybe the network infrastructure has some restrictions, but the servers themselves? The hardware receives and sends ethernet frames, a layer below IP. Can you describe...
Thanks for the information, it makes more sense now. :) I assume the deployment will be similar to online.net's servers where you can request a prefix delegation via DHCPv6-PD then....
Looks good. Like I stated in the community thread, even simple local IPv6 connectivity would be quite helpful for me already.
@moul, is there any progress with IPv6 on the C1 hardware?
Unfortunately, the way you implemented IPv6 on C2/VPS is the best example of how not do it I have seen yet. And the advertisement is off topic here, too. Scaleway...
@HLFH sure. Each server just gets a single IPv6 address in a /127 subnet. The recommendation is to allocate at least a /64 per node, so that's really bad and...
OK then. But this is barely usable, there isn't really much point in releasing IPv6 support in such an unfinished state and still claiming to be "fully IPv6 ready". It's...