Greg Dennis
Greg Dennis
This isn't an issue for this library so much as for JsonLogic in general. I started on a .Net implementation of JsonLogic, but found there were too many inconsistencies in...
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** This may already be supported, but it's not mentioned in the readme/docs. **Describe the solution you'd like** I'd like to...
As a continuation of #155910, it'd be great to have some sort of UX that informs the user that a git repo was found but is untrusted perhaps along with...
I think it'd really help if there were a way to do a dry run. This would perform everything up to the actual publish. It would be really useful for...
This is quite a change, so I'd be happy to walk anyone through it. ## Summary Following the idea from [this thread](https://github.com/orgs/json-schema-org/discussions/63#discussioncomment-2960665) and [this thread](https://github.com/orgs/json-schema-org/discussions/63#discussioncomment-2968029), this PR changes the concept...
I noticed a few places where the spec is using several different phrasings to mean the same thing. This PR aligns them to what we agreed it should be called...
_This will likely be of most interest to @handrews and maybe @jdesrosiers._ Since the introduction of vocabularies, the idea of them being self-descriptive has been tossed around with abstract ideas...
Resolves #1069 Relates to #1070 & #1071 Happy to take opinions on the content of 👇. It all works pretty well, though, so I don't think I'll be changing the...
The [`prefixItems` keyword section](http://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-core.html#rfc.section.10.3.1.1) says this: > Validation succeeds if each element of the instance validates against the schema at the same position, if any. This keyword does not constrain...
Currently, the keywords are organized based on what "kind" of keyword they are: applicator vs annotation vs assertion (vs "special"). | core | applicator | validation | unevaluated | meta-data...