Gonzalo Rafuls

We don't have any logic in place to discriminate hosts in broken state from being listed as cloud01 though they would not be available for scheduling. We should also be...

Resolved here: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-performance/quads/+/523195

jira_watchers looks only for pending tickets with EXTENSION labels and if any of those have a parent jira ticket then we extract the watchers from it and include them into...

We could use something like this: https://gist.github.com/grafuls/f279239c8bfe478020c266febeb37c79

+1 on this. We already make use of services for quads-web and quads-server so I believe it would be trivial to implement this too on `rpm.spec`.

A first patch for a Flask implementation in the form of quads-web sysctl service has been merged here [1]. [1] https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-performance/quads/+/498781

We can easily narrow the expansion scenario when running add-schedule on a cloud which has current/active schedules.

We are already grouping those from within each host but not per cloud. Would be a much greater enhancement if so. Leaving this open for that reason.

> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kambiz Aghaiepour ***@***.***> wrote: I like this idea. Currently what happens when a single host schedule request cannot be fulfilled...

Leaving this on hold for the time being. Not able to execute more than 1 command in 1 session and not much support for this python library.