Michael Wayne Goodman

@arademaker I stepped back from the conversation between you and Stephan, but I hope I have not dropped the ball somewhere. Do you have any remaining questions?

I'm not adding support just yet, but I'm thinking of adding a `modified` column to the `lexicons` table which gets set to a true value when someone makes such changes....

My first thought was to set up some triggers so that any changes to the database, whether using Wn or not, would set the `modified` flag, but that means creating...

@Hypercookie No, not yet. This feature won't be implemented until it has some higher priority, because new features -> more code to maintain, and, for the moment, I'm the only...

Thanks, @Hypercookie, for explaining its importance, and for taking the initiative to implement it. I have some further thoughts regarding the implementation if this were to be merged into this...

(recreating what I think was the context) >> Perhaps the most straightforward method is to modify the LMF data in-memory, then to add it to the database as normal, because...

@Hypercookie thanks for sharing. It looks like you've put in a ton of work, and it's nice to see it shaping up. As it currently is, however, I don't think...

Great, I'm glad that makes sense to you, too. Regarding the internals, `logger` should be created by your module (`logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)` is a common idiom). I don't have any...

> Can you confirm that it is guaranteed that using the lexicon id and the object id only ever identifies one object (I know that this *should* be the case,...

I definitely do not expect or encourage multiple synsets or senses with the same id and from the same lexicon. I'll see if I can get those constraints added. And...