Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
@stevespringett > Unless I'm overlooking something, SPDX 2.3 still cannot state what a component is, rather, people have to use external reference identifiers which are "believed to be relevant to...
Providing a link to a proposal made by @zvr - https://github.com/spdx/change-proposal/issues/4
Creating a new issue to track the fact that https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/ points to 2.2.2 instead of 2.3
> I am confused that this issue is not more prominent - are snippets not used much? Snippets are not very common, but they are used. The main reason this...
Thanks @anthonyharrison
@swinslow @jlovejoy Jilayne's changes were merged and a new release of the online tool has been moved to production. You can check out the license submission tools at https://tools.spdx.org/app/submit_new_license/
There are some ongoing discussions in the SPDX tech community about possibly supporting a simpler JSON format of the spec complete with a JSON schema. If there is interest in...
> the association was only meant as a way to indicate that the snippet can't exists without a File or a ReferencedFile in the document In SPDX, we allow the...
I added this in PR #877 for the version 3 release. I'll leave this open in case we do another dot release of 2.3 - currently this is not planned.
This has been superseded by PR #877 - closing