Gary O'Neall

Moving this issue to the SPDX spec as suggested by @vlsi - I don't think there is any more work to be done in the Maven plugin beyond using the...

@kestewart > can you figure a way to pull this into 2.3 release? Done

@patriksvensson This is unique to the RDF examples. The RDF picks up all the properties for the SPDX listed license - many of these properties are not documented in the...

@patriksvensson Thanks for the PR to fix this - this is also fixed in PR #782 which is awaiting review before merging. Once PR #782 is reviewed / merged we...

> What is the difference between DEPENDENCY_MANIFEST_OF and METAFILE_OF You can look at issue #154 where this was discussed > Can CONTAINS be used for non-archives, e.g. a iso-image contains...

@richardfontana Thanks for reporting the issue. > I hope this is the right place to report this issue. Close enough, but I'll transfer this over to the SPDX Java Library...

I looked into this a bit further and it is indeed a markup issue for the `MPL-2.0-no-copyleft-exception` license. Both exhibits (A and B) are wrapped in an `` which I...

The links are automatically checked by the [licenselistpublisher](https://github.com/spdx/licenselistPublisher). When I get some time, I'll investigate why the test is failing. The code that does this check is here: https://github.com/spdx/LicenseListPublisher/blob/fd6416916438e6a50b579ac68a313b760c8d8f4c/src/org/spdx/crossref/Live.java#L46

Update: When I run the LicenseListPublisher locally, it finds reports the link live. But it looks like when it is run with the github action, it shows the link as...

We could do a "hack" and allow all OSI web pages to be "live" even if they may really be dead links. I would be much more comfortable, however, if...