Arnoud Glimmerveen

@bvarner as I am interested in this as well I had a look at the branch and tried it out myself. It looks pretty good IMO. I have also seen...

I have done some additional experiments and noticed that the re-written version is visible for plugins when they obtain that version from the injected MavenProject. If the version is supplied...

After integration with Jenkins I got following warning from Jenkins' Maven probe: ``` [WARNING] [jenkins-event-spy] Unexpected Maven project file name 'pom-gitflow-massaged.xml', problems may occur ``` This probe is aware of...

I have a final observation and that is related to the use of profiles. It appears that if a pom contains a profile that is activated with a file (exists/missing),...

With regards to the massaged pom file containing resolved (absolute) paths for file-based profile activation: this is indeed an issue in Maven itself. There is a PR open at Maven...

@rdefreitas : as far as I can tell, we are still waiting for @bvarner to have a look at the provided feedback. From the last couple of months using the...

@rdefreitas I guess the feature toggle is already present, if you configure ``, this functionality is disabled. To my knowledge this functionality has never worked for multi-module projects, and the...

> > > My apologies for not giving this the attention it deserves -- it sounds like this solves some problems (while potentially creating plenty more corner cases) for some...

@bvarner I think I have been able to address the limitation I mentioned about partial building of multi-module project. I opened PR #120. Could you take a look at it,...

Hi @bvarner, any progress on getting a 3.1.0 release of gitflow with the proposed changes? Also I'd like to bring to your attention PR #120 that removes an, in my...